Founder docs

Market + Funding Appendix

Legacy Defenders revenue layers, GMV influence, national scale math, and proof milestones before outside capital.

0-90 Days To Prove
1 Completed Customer

Revenue Layers

The fair model is help first, then charge when the next layer creates real value.

Stage Customer Offer Revenue Type
Start Free first estate strategy report Marketing cost and trust engine
DIY AI credit packs Digital revenue without a subscription
DIY + items QR stickers, item routing, sold-data research, memory-cost view Credits, kit, item research
Guided Paid remote review, video walkthrough, or local visit Review revenue and conversion step
Planned Estate Clarity Plan Planning revenue
Documented Records + Provider Packet Records and professional packet revenue
Bottleneck Belongings Sprint Service coordination revenue
Execution Managed scope through local operators Management fee, margin, or provider economics
House strategy Market-ready prep, rent-ready, restomod, or investor/listing path Project margin and partner economics

Ten-Year Base Model

Year Paid Digital Users Reviews / Visits Plans + Packets Managed Projects Base-Case Net Revenue
2026 100 25 10 3 $40K
2027 400 100 50 12 $200K
2028 1,000 250 150 35 $640K
2029 2,500 600 400 90 $1.8M
2030 5,000 1,200 900 200 $4.3M
2031 9,000 2,200 1,600 400 $8.9M
2032 16,000 4,000 3,000 800 $18.6M
2033 28,000 7,000 5,000 1,500 $36.5M
2034 42,000 10,000 7,500 2,800 $67.7M
2035 60,000 14,000 10,000 4,500 $113.3M

This is a base case, not a promise. The key is that 4,500 managed projects in 2035 would still be only about 0.13% of projected U.S. deaths.

GMV Influenced

Net revenue is not the whole footprint.

If 4,500 managed projects influence an average of $50K-$150K in belongings, provider work, repair scope, renovation, listing prep, sale strategy, investor comparison, or rental-readiness value, Legacy could influence $225M-$675M of annual estate/home-transition GMV.

That is what makes this more interesting than cleanout revenue.

Proof Before Outside Capital

The clean funding story is: we built the AI workflow, proved Pittsburgh demand, began Philadelphia replication, and now need capital mainly to scale marketing, product automation, compliance, and market rollout.

Proof Needed Target Signal
Free report demand 1,000-3,000 report starts
Paid digital usage 100-300 paid credit users
Person-check conversion 40-100 paid reviews or visits
Managed projects 10-25 Pittsburgh projects plus 1-8 Philadelphia/partner pilots
Case studies 5-10 strong documented examples
GMV influenced $500K-$3M of estate/home work influenced
Unit economics Clear CAC, conversion, net revenue, gross margin, cycle time, and provider reliability

Funding Milestones

If Pittsburgh works and Philadelphia has real signal, a reasonable first outside-capital target is $1M-$2M, used mostly to scale marketing, product automation, provider onboarding, compliance, and market operations.

Milestone What It Means
Pittsburgh proof Real report starts, paid reviews, local visits, provider scopes, and completed case studies.
Philadelphia signal The same message starts to work in a larger, older-housing market without Keith manually carrying every interaction.
Software leverage AI intake, report generation, provider packets, and records exports reduce human coordination time.
Unit economics CAC, conversion, gross margin, cycle time, provider reliability, and customer outcomes are measurable.
Market rollout Capital can buy repeatable demand and product automation instead of subsidizing confusion.

Do not defend the company by saying "AI companies get high multiples." Defend it by showing that AI reduces labor, increases conversion, creates structured data, and routes high-value estate/home work through the network.